This audit was generated on April 26, 2026
The data may no longer be up to date.
How your app performs across different visibility factors
Sign up for free and get daily updates on your app's visibility and rankings.
Start tracking for freeYour app's position for key search terms
10
Keywords analyzed
3
Ranked in top 100
1
In top 10
| Keyword | Rank | Traffic | Difficulty | Ahead | Behind | Top 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| forutan | #1 | — | ||||
| timesheet | #77 | |||||
| time sheetOpportunity | #84 | |||||
| work hours trackerOpportunity | Not ranked | — | — | |||
| payment cycleOpportunity | Not ranked | — | — | |||
| time trackingOpportunity | Not ranked | — | — | |||
| hourly wageOpportunity | Not ranked | — | — | |||
| job trackerOpportunity | Not ranked | — | — | |||
| work logOpportunity | Not ranked | — | — | |||
| payroll trackerOpportunity | Not ranked | — | — |
Apps positioned directly before or after yours on keywords
Productivity
Health & Fitness
Finance
Productivity
Occurrence count shows how many keywords each competitor appears on
Productivity chart position
ChatGPT
Meta AI - Assistant & Glasses
Claude by Anthropic
Google Gemini
Microsoft Word: Edit Documents
MeloTick
PDF Reader - PDF Viewer
Grok - AI Chat & Video
Microsoft Excel: Spreadsheets
Adobe Acrobat Reader: Edit PDF
ScanNow Home
Phone Storage Clean
Google Docs
PDF Reader, Editor & Scanner
DuckDuckGo, Duck.ai, & VPN
Improve your ratings and downloads to climb the category charts.
Personalized insights generated by our AI
Timesheet History has critically low visibility (16/100) with only 3 keywords ranking and zero chart presence. The app is severely under-optimized for high-traffic terms despite having functional core features, missing massive opportunities in the competitive time-tracking market where top keywords drive 40-64 traffic each.
Only 2 out of 10 analyzed keywords rank (forutan #1, timesheet #77, time sheet #84), leaving 80% of targeted keywords completely invisible. High-value terms like 'job tracker' (traffic 64, difficulty 41), 'payment cycle' (traffic 48, difficulty 37), and 'hourly wage' (traffic 34, difficulty 34) are unranked despite manageable difficulty scores. The app's only ranked branded term 'forutan' drives minimal relevant traffic.
Multiple relevant keywords show traffic potential with accessible difficulty: 'payment cycle' (48/37), 'hourly wage' (34/34), and 'job tracker' (64/41) all have difficulty under 50. The app already supports these features (payment cycles, different rates per job, multiple jobs) but fails to target them in metadata. Competitor analysis shows only 1-2 shared keywords, indicating open ranking space.
Not ranked in Productivity category despite being a core time-tracking app. Category ranking drives 15-40% of organic discovery in Google Play. The 3.9/5 rating with only 331 reviews creates a credibility gap against established competitors, and lack of chart presence creates a visibility death spiral.
The app demonstrates sophisticated capabilities matching high-intent keywords: customizable payment cycles, multiple jobs with color coding, variable rates by day/hour, and break management. These features align with unranked keywords 'payroll tracker', 'work hours tracker', and 'time tracking' but aren't leveraged in ASO metadata.
Current title 'Timesheet History' wastes 28 characters with low-traffic 'History' modifier. Google Play allows 30 characters; renaming to include high-value terms like 'Timesheet: Work Hours Tracker' or 'Timesheet & Payroll Tracker' could immediately capture 'work hours tracker' (41 traffic) and 'payroll tracker' (42 traffic) searches while maintaining branding.
First 500 characters bury searchable keywords in feature lists without strategic placement. No targeted use of 'time tracking', 'work hours', 'hourly wage', or 'payroll' in high-visibility positions. Google Play's algorithm weighs early description heavily; current structure prioritizes features over discoverability.
Actionable recommendations to improve your visibility
Ranking in top 10 for 1 keyword(s): forutan.
A 3.9 rating may deter potential users. Focus on fixing bugs and improving UX.
Score of 16/100 suggests room for ASO optimization. Focus on keywords and category ranking.
Improving ratings and downloads can help reach category top charts.
This audit gives you a snapshot. With Applyra, you get continuous monitoring, competitor alerts, and AI-powered recommendations to grow your app.
No credit card required · Cancel anytime
Common questions about this ASO audit.
Timesheet History has a visibility score of 16 out of 100 on the Google Play (US). The score combines keyword rankings, top charts presence, and listing quality signals like rating and update recency. This audit was generated on April 26, 2026.
Timesheet History is tracked on 10 keywords in this audit. It currently ranks in the top 100 for 3 keywords, with 1 keyword reaching the top 10. Ranking in the top 10 is where most discovery traffic happens.
Based on shared keyword rankings, the most frequent competitors of Timesheet History are Timesheet Portal, FitrWoman, Nexonia Timesheets. These apps appear next to Timesheet History on the keywords it ranks for, which makes them the most direct opportunities for ASO benchmarking.
Timesheet History is listed in the Productivity category on the Google Play.
Based on this audit, Timesheet History should focus on the keywords where it ranks 11 to 50 (closest to the top 10), benchmark its title and subtitle against the most frequent competitors, and refresh its listing regularly to maintain quality signals. The full audit lists specific weaknesses, opportunities, and AI-generated suggestions tailored to Timesheet History.
This audit was generated automatically by Applyra by scraping public Google Play data: app metadata, keyword rankings, category positions, and competitor listings. Visibility, keyword and listing quality scores are computed from those signals. Audits are free and do not require an Applyra account.