Fight AI: Your Ai MMA coach

Owning rank 1 for 'fight ai' with 56 traffic volume is valuable for direct discovery, though this represents branded search rather than organic acquisition. The 47 difficulty score indicates this was achievable but still defensible against competitors like 'AI Battler' and 'Pi'.

Ranking #8 for 'mma training' (57 traffic) and #6 for 'fight training' (38 traffic) demonstrates relevance in core use-case searches. These positions drive qualified users actively seeking training solutions, not just AI curiosity.

0% Charts Score with no category ranking means the app misses ~40% of category browsing traffic. Competing apps like Champs MMA and HumanGO likely capture this passive discovery channel, forcing Fight AI to rely entirely on search.

Rank #57 for 'ai coach' (30 traffic, 69 difficulty) exposes a positioning gap—the app's core value proposition lacks visibility in its most descriptive search. High difficulty suggests entrenched competition, requiring alternative keyword strategy rather than direct pursuit.

Low-competition terms like 'jiu jitsu analyzer' (difficulty 26, rank 35) and unranked 'wrestling analysis' (difficulty 29) present immediate wins. The description mentions tracking 'across' these sports—dedicated landing copy and keyword targeting could capture underserved grappling audiences.

Shared keywords with 'Champs MMA' (ahead) and 'Boxing Training & Workout App' (behind) reveal specific territory gaps. Only 1 keyword overlap with 6 competitors suggests minimal keyword cannibalization but also missed bidding/optimization on competitor brand terms.