MasterDex - Complete Pokedex

MasterDex achieves rank 1 for its exact brand name and category-defining terms 'pokedex', 'pokemon database', and 'offline pokedex'—securing 50-58 traffic volume with strong difficulty management (29-35 range). This creates a defensive moat against competitors like CTA Dex that only show 'ahead' on 1 shared keyword.

0% charts score with no global or category ranking indicates algorithmic discoverability collapse despite 90% quality score. Entertainment category placement may be suboptimal for a utility-heavy Pokédex app; competitors likely rank in Tools or Reference categories where purchase intent aligns better.

'Pokemon tcg' generates 68 traffic—highest among all analyzed keywords—yet remains unranked despite actual TCG features existing in-app. Competitor 'TCG MasterDex - Track cards' and 'TCG Hub' validate demand; optimizing metadata and screenshots for this term could capture spillover from card collector searches.

Explicitly featured in description ('intuitive team-building feature') but 'team builder' keyword shows no ranking despite moderate competition (difficulty 42). This represents feature-marketing misalignment—users searching team strategy tools cannot find the app.

Rank 76 for 'shiny pokemon tracker' (47 traffic, difficulty 39) places the app in results but with minimal visibility. Low difficulty suggests achievable top-10 advancement through dedicated metadata placement, potentially differentiating from basic Pokédex competitors.

Unranked for 'pokemon companion' (55 traffic, difficulty 35) despite app positioning as 'ultimate companion' in description. This keyword bridges casual fan and trainer segments; capturing it would broaden audience beyond pure database users to engagement-focused players.